|
Philosophy
in the Contemporary World
Volumes
1-8 (1994-2001)
|
Volume 1, Number 1, Spring 1994
Time
and Space in African (Igbo) Thought
Egbeke Aja
Abstract:This
paper is an attempt to articulate an African (Igbo) conception of
space and time. Igbo terms and phrases are explained in light of
their traditional, non-European cultural and linguistic background.
Care is taken to present a distinctively African account, not a
neo-colonial one. The African conceptions of space and time account
for some African beliefs and practices regarding causality, including
such widely misunderstood phenomena as divination, the "medicine
man," and "magic."
Paradise
Well Lost: Communitarian Nostalgia and the Lonely Logic of the Liberal
Self
Charles W. Harvey
Abstract:"Paradise
Well Lost" offers a description and criticism of communitarian claims
that in contemporary liberal society the self is in sad shape, that
liberal society is out of harmony with the needs of the self, and
that such a society makes the good life nearly impossible to achieve.
It is argued that communitarian thought is driven by a false and
deluded nostalgia for a self-world unity that never was and never
can be, that human consciousness prohibits the neatly unified communialization
of self and world that seems desired by much communitarian thinking.
A final argument claims that there are nontrivial connections between
the communitarian desire for self-world unity, and the twentieth-century
emergence of totalitarian society--connections about which it is
wise to be worried.
Right Intention
and the Oil Factor in the Second Gulf War
Kenneth W. Kemp
Abstract:This
essay responds to the argument that US interest in Kuwaiti oil made
its war against Iraq fail the just-war criterion of right intention.
That argument is based on a misunderstanding of the criterion, namely,
that right intention requires not merely the presence of a concern
for justice but the absence of any other (especially self-interested)
motives. Correction of this misunderstanding is important to application
of the just-war theory to the general question of intervention in
foreign wars.
Moral Fanaticism
and the Holocaust: A Defense of Kant Against Silber
Lee F. Kerckhove
Abstract: I defend Kant's moral psychology against John R. Silber's
argument that Kant cannot account for the radical evil of Hitler.
Silber's argument cannot be maintained, I argue, if Kant's account
of theological and moral fanaticism, and the personality of the
moral fanatic, are taken into account. I contend that Kant's writings
support an analogy between the fanatical pursuit of religious and
moral ideals and Hitler's fanatical pursuit of an ideal of racial
purity. I conclude that Kant's account of moral fanaticism is adequate
to account for the actions and moral psychology of Hitler.
Identity,
Social Relations, and Time: The Implications of Mead for Democratic
Social Theory.
Ric Caric Northrup
Abstract:
This essay analyzes the nature of social relations when individual
identity is conceived as both autonomous and socially constructed.
Viewing identity as autonomous and socially constructed makes it
necessary both to conceive individuals as socially related to others
in the present and past, and to incorporate individuals into multiple
systems of social relations. I argue that George Herbert Mead's
theory of social systems provides a basis for performing these tasks.
By adding a concept of "contemporaneous consciousness" to Mead's
notion of temporal systems, it is possible to view individuals as
autonomous within a multiplicity of temporal systems.
Death and
Pictures in Wittgenstein's 'Tractatus'
Saranindranath Tagore
Abstract:
The Picture Theory based on a realist ontology is central to the
argument of the Tractatus. Wittgenstein, however, makes idealist
claims while discussing the notion of the metaphysical subject.
In this paper, I develop an interpretation of this text in which
realism and idealism are reconciled. The task is accomplished by
focusing on the later remarks of the Tractatus in general
and the remarks on death in particular.
Constitution
and By-Laws
Society for Philosophy in the Contemporary World
No
Abstract
Volume
1, Number 2, Summer 1994
MacIntyre's
Conservatism and Its Cure: The Formal Structure of Traditions.
Matthew Freytag
Abstract:
Conservative communitarian Alasdair MacIntyre makes a fundamental
claim about the formal conditions for rationality, personhood, and
intelligible valuation, and a detachable, less fundamental empirical
claim that these formal conditions can be met only in a hierarchically
organized social tradition. Having suggested a formal account of
narrative tradition which relies on the schematic notion of systematic
complexity, MacIntyre retreats to an account in terms of canon and
authority. He thus obscures the structures that underlie his own
metaphysics of morals, the structures of the practices, narrative
unities, and traditions which on his account are both identity-constituting
and value-creating. Once these structures are discerned, the possibility
of good lives will no longer seem linked to preservation of the
forms of the existing polis.
Multiculturalism
and Welfare Reform
John D. Jones
Abstract:
Multiculturalism has not yet systematically addressed, much less
challenged, dominant approaches to poverty and welfare reform. This
lacuna must be rectified since the widespread poverty experienced
by people of color poses a substantive threat to the development
of a truly inclusive and multicultural society. Present approaches
to poverty, defined in the context of welfare reform, are defective
for three reasons: First, welfare reform basically aims to reduce
welfare "dependency" by moving so-called able-bodied welfare recipients
off welfare and into the labor market. This project seems destined
to fail given a chronic scarcity of jobs, and especially decent-paying
jobs. Second, welfare reform does not provide an adequate framework
for the general alleviation of poverty since many poor receive little
or no welfare assistance. Third, welfare assistance is based on
an invidious, stigmatizing distinction between the able-bodied poor
(viewed as unworthy and disreputable) and the disabled poor. Thus,
given disproportionate rates of poverty among people of color as
well as a general (but mistaken) impression that US poverty is principally
a "minority" problem, present policies and attitudes toward the
poor insure that many people of color will bear the brunt of economic
and symbolic marginalization despite gains which accrue to some
people of color as the result of greater racial and cultural inclusiveness.
Health Maintenance
as Responsibility for Self.
Raymond Kolcaba & Katharine Kolcaba
Abstract:
Many kinds of health compromising norms, habits, and beliefs are
highly resistant to change thereby preventing new knowledge about
health maintenance from advancing widespread better health. Persons
would be more responsive if they used a health ethic to harmonize
personal behavior with health-maintaining practices. We argue that
common sense morality includes a portion of a health ethic in the
guise of responsibilities to maintain health as well as avoid self
destruction. We discuss an example in which its application can
retard decline in older age that results from a sedentary lifestyle.
Philosophy
of Liberation in the North American Context: Transforming Oppressor
Consciousness.
Kate Lindemann
Abstract:
This paper utilizes concepts form the works of Paulo Freire
and other Latin American philosophers of liberation to formulate
a philosophy of liberation in a North American context. Since many
North Americans experience a double consciousness, that is, both
oppressor and oppressed consciousness, our liberating task is quite
complex. This study offers both a philosophical framework and an
example of the process of demythologizing one aspect of North American
consciousness, the consciousness of privilege.
The
Methodological Isolation of Religious Belief.
Edward L. Schoen
Abstract:
According to Langdon Gilkey, both religion and science are cognitive
enterprises, but they are separated methodologically. As a result,
science and religion are concerned with different, though related
levels of truth. Against these claims, historical examples are used
to argue that scientific and religious explanations cannot be so
neatly separated. To the contrary, both fields frequently treat
overlapping ranges of data in methodologically opportunistic ways.
The
Sociopolitical Implications of Multiculturalism.
Jorge M. Valadez
Abstract:
In this essay, I propose a definition of multiculturalism and provide
pragmatic and theoretical reasons for accepting the multicultural
perspective when it is defined in this manner. In addition, I discuss
and defend three sociopolitical principles to which we are committed
in adopting the multicultural perspective and discuss some of the
concrete social and institutional changes needed for implementing
these principles.
Volume
1, Number 3, Fall 1994
Democratic
Public Judgment: The Role of "Mutual Comprehension".
Michael K. Briand
Abstract:
The need to choose between good things in conflict lies at the heart
of politics. Only citizens deliberating together can authoritatively
form the democratic public judgment necessary to resolve such conflicts.
The key step to arriving at a sound widely supported public judgment
is getting all members of the public to "comprehend"--to understand
and appreciate--the goods in conflict. Mutual comprehension enables
us to combine our individual perspectives without loss, thereby
providing the basis for collective deliberation. Such comprehension
is essential because the mutual respect between citizens upon which
democratic politics depends is impossible without it. Mutual comprehension
is possible because we share a common human nature that, despite
our manifest and irreducible differences is built around a limited
and universal set of human needs and dispositions.
Transforming
Stories: The Death of Ivan Ilyich, The Birth of A Reflective
Life.
Jeremiah Conway
Abstract:
The problem addressed by this paper concerns the responsibility
of higher education in the growing thoughtlessness of culture. By
"thoughtlessness" is meant not the absence of mental "busyness,"
but indifference to the self-reflective life. How do we cope with
the fact that, for so many, the educative act has little or nothing
to do with the cultivation of self-reflection, especially when this
indifference is amply represented within higher education as well
as the wider culture? The paper unfolds in three sections. First,
it explores the factors complicating the search for effective materials
by which to instigate and encourage the transformation to a self-reflective
life. Second, it argues that stories, particularly what it calls
"transforming stories," play an important role in provoking and
providing insight into the "turning around of the soul" from unreflective
to reflective living. Finally, it illustrates how one such transforming
story, The Death of Ivan Ilyich, by Leo Tolstoy, helps accomplish
this educational goal.
Pluralism,
Integrity, and the Interpretive Model of Law
Deirdre Golash
Abstract:
In Law's Empire, Ronald Dworkin argues that the choice between
conflicting interpretations of law is, and should be, influenced
by the aspiration to "integrity," that is, the construction of law
as a coherent whole, as though it were the product of a single author.
I argue that, particularly under conditions where opinion on relevant
issues is significantly divided, the search for a single coherent
explanation of law may be seriously misleading. The idea of integrity
is a principled basis for legal interpretation only where there
is an underlying unity, rather than an underlying plurality. Dworkin
suggests that there is a basis for striving toward such unity, and
for an obligation to obey the law, in our "associative" obligations
to fellow members of our political community. I argue that such
obligations, to the extent that they exist, are too weak to provide
an adequate basis for a moral obligation to obey the law.
Healing
the Ills of Unemployment, Societal Breakdown, and Ecological Degradation:
Gandhi's Vision for a Sustainable Way of Life.
Bart Gruzalski
Abstract:
In this paper I describe Gandhi's vision for a way of life that
would be an essential part of any sustainable solution to world
wide problems of unemployment, societal breakdown and ecological
degradation. Gandhi's vision included a communitarian lifestyle
of simplicity and non-accumulation in which agriculture would be
supported by cottage industries using appropriate technologies (e.g.,
spinning). Assuming obligations to future generations, Gandhi's
proposal highlights the degree to which our First-World lifestyle
is morally impermissible. One objection to this criticism of our
First-World lifestyles is that we can solve the problem of ecological
degradation by exporting only appropriate technologies to the Third
World and supplementing our use of consumptive technologies with
technological cleanups. This suggestion is not only irresponsible
and unjust, but also hopeless, for our resource consumptive standards
are already the model for development worldwide. To counteract this
destructive model we must begin to recreate, in the First World,
sustainable lifestyles that others will want to emulate. Part of
this task involves the inner work that has been a casualty of the
ideologies of modernity, and Gandhi's vision is a blueprint for
both the outer and inner work that are essential to recreate a sustainable
society.
Feminism
and Vegetarianism: A Critique of Peter Singer.
Erin McKenna
Abstract:
Singer's ethics assume an autonomous, impartial, abstract reasoner.
Nonhuman animals, like human animals, have an interest in not suffering;
so we all agree on an impartial, rational, consistent minimum standard
of treatment that we see must extend to nonhuman animals. While
I think this kind of argument works well in the "liberal" context
of countries based on social contract reasoning, I am not convinced
it goes far enough in achieving the desired attitude shift. We are
still encouraged to think in terms of the self-interest of an autonomous,
impartial, abstract reasoner, and thus there are many instances
in which it is perfectly "reasonable" to harm nonhuman animals.
To challenge Singer I use
views of the individual proposed by socialist feminist and radical
feminist theories. Both of these theories (in all their variety)
propose a substantial revisioning of the individual and thereby
shift the focus from rights talk to issues of responsibility and
care. While there are clear dangers in these approaches as well,
I believe there is a fruitful combination of Singer's argument with
these feminist approaches that will help us see the deep nature
of our connectedness to nonhuman animals and make us realize that
the eating of meat is really a form of cannibalism.
Feminism
and Vegetarianism: A Response
Peter Singer
Abstract:
Erin McKenna is correct to question the relative weight that I give
to emotions and reason in Animal Liberation. In 1975 when
the first edition was published, emotion played a key role in the
campaigns of animal societies, and I wished to make an appeal to
reason that would have ethical and political impact. I disagree
with McKenna's conclusion that an impartial, objective stance is
either impossible or undesirable. I argue that we should not abandon
the attempt to reach an impartial position. Admittedly, in some
disputes, giving equal weight to all interests will be extraordinarily
difficult. But to do so is not impossible, just extraordinarily
difficult, and a decision must be make regarding which course is
better on the whole. This difficulty gives no reason to abandon
impartiality.
Can
Justice as Fairness Accommodate Diversity? An Examination of the
Representation of Minorities and Women in A Theory of Justice.
Lara M. Trout
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to expose a problem of application
in John Rawls' theory of justice. An examination of his treatment
of the application of his principles in A Theory of Justice
reveals an insensitivity toward the proper representation of minorities
and women. This problem, which is rooted in Rawls' conception of
the relevant social position is not properly addressed by him, yet
is grounded in inconsistencies which undermine the just practical
implementation of his theory. A provisional solution to this problem
is to provide the original position with historical information,
as well as to place within its jurisdiction the application of the
two principles of justice.
Volume
1, Number 4, Winter 1994
Is
Deep Ecology Too Radical?
William Aiken
Abstract:
The theory of Deep Ecology is characterized as having two essential
features: the belief that nature is inherently valuable, and the
belief that one's self is truly realized by identification with
nature. Four common but different meanings of the term "radical"
are presented. Whether the theory of Deep Ecology is "too radical"
depends upon which of these meanings one is using.
A
Surprising Rediscovery and Partial Review of The Foundations
of Belief by James Balfour.
Wallace Gray
Abstract:
Well known as the British politician responsible for the Balfour
Declaration during World War I, James Balfour was also a philosopher.
Long forgotten, his remarkable book The Foundations of Belief
(1985) merits contemporary reassessment. Critical of modern compartmentalization,
Balfour argues for an integration of religion, philosophy, and science--a
position now often identified as postmodern. This article presents
some of Balfour's contemporary scholarly significance, and hints
at his usefulness in undergraduate teaching.
Moral
Growth in Children's Literature: A Primer with Examples.
Joe Frank Jones, III
Abstract:
This essay applies a plausible model for moral growth to examples
of secular and religious children's literature. The point is that
moral maturation, given this model, requires imaginary worlds on
both secular and religious presuppositions. Trying to guide a child's
reading toward either religious or secular books rather than toward
good literature is shown therefore to miss the mark of good parenting.
Speaking
for Myself in Philosophy.
Laura Duhan Kaplan
Abstract:
The conventions of positivism, still the standard model for academic
discourse, require philosophers to take knowledge out of the context
of personal experience. In this essay, I argue that such a decontextualization
impoverished the development of moral and epistemological knowledge.
I propose to contextualize such knowledge by using the personal
essay as a style of philosophical writing. As literary style shapes
what can be thought and said, adoption of a different literary style
calls for a reinterpretation of philosophy's understanding of the
self, the quest for truth. and the nature of universality.
Five
Arguments for Vegetarianism.
William O. Stephens
Abstract:
Five different arguments for vegetarianism are discussed: the system
of meat production deprives poor people of food to provide meat
for the wealthy. thus violating the principle of distributive justice;
the world livestock industry causes great and manifold ecological
destruction; meat-eating cultures and societal oppression of women
are intimately linked and so feminism and vegetarianism must both
be embraced to transform our patriarchal culture; both utilitarian
and rights-based reasoning lead to the conclusion that raising and
slaughtering animals is immoral, and so we ought to boycott meat;
meat consumption causes many serious diseases and lowers life expectancy,
and so is unhealthy. Objections to each argument are examined. The
conclusion reached is that the cumulative case successfully establishes
vegetarianism as a virtuous goal.
Feminist
Revaluation of the Mythical Triad, Lilith, Adam, Eve: A Contribution
to Role Model Theory.
Henny Wenkart
Abstract:
This essay inquires into the need for and power of role models,
and suggests some answers. The example it employs to study the issue
is the contemporary Jewish feminist "role model," Lilith, first
wife of Adam. Various and opposite forms of the Lilith-and-Adam
myth through the ages are given, including new contributions from
a Lilith anthology in preparation by the author and others. Those
needs of women and men that the mythical "role model" is constructed
to satisfy are suggested.
Volume
2, Number 1, Spring 1995
Rorty,
Ironist Theory, and Socio-Political Control.
Dane Depp
Abstract:
In Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Richard Rorty courageously
takes a stand against the public dissemination of ironist philosophical
theory, such as that produced by Nietzsche, because he sees it as
being socially undermining and irreconcilable in theoretical terms
with liberal democratic values. And yet, the intellectuals in his
ideal society would, privately, share many of the same views from
which Rorty would desire that the general public be protected. Thus
Rorty would appear to trade tensions between the individual and
the state for tensions between the intellectual and the nonintellectual--a
dubious improvement. By redescribing both the motives of the typical
ironist theorist and his basic view of large-scale, socio-political
structure I will try to reinstate the social value of ironist theory.
Throughout the paper I will formulate perspectives and raise questions
illustrative of such theory and aimed at trying to maintain as full
and open a communication as possible between the individual, whether
intellectual or not, and socio-political structures within which
he finds himself.
Crisis
and Narrativity
Ron Hirschbein
Abstract:
Despite the dramatic changes in international politics it appears
that crises--episodes in which decision-makers hazard urgent, perilous
choices--will remain a prominent and dangerous feature of international
relations. This realization prompts the question that informs this
paper: why do American decision-makers define a situation as a crisis
in the first place? I argue that prevailing theories do not adequately
account for crises: the same situation (or perception of the situation)
may be interpreted differently by various decision-makers. Specifically,
it may be construed as an endurable problem to be resolved in due
course, or an unendurable crisis demanding immediate resolution
at considerable risk. I entertain the possibility that crises occur
because crisis discourse has become the lingua franca in
the halls of power. Taking a semiotic approach, I argue that crisis
narratives are read into ambiguous situations to render them meaningful
and dramatically self-valorizing.
Cultural
Diversity and the Systems View.
Debora Hammond
Abstract:
While systems concepts had a tremendous impact on social thought
in the 1950s and 1960s, they are increasingly under attack in the
current postmodern climate with its emphasis on particularity and
difference. The idea of the system is associated with technocracy,
hierarchical forms of social organization, and the suppression of
individual difference. However, there is a significant body of work
within the systems tradition that fosters an appreciation of diversity
through its ecological orientation, and supports more participatory
forms of social organization based on its understanding of the self-organizing
nature of living systems. While the issue of cultural diversity
is often addressed in oppositional terms, I suggest that it might
be more effectively served through an appreciation of the global
interdependence between all peoples and between humans and nature
that can only be sustained on a cooperative and participatory basis.
Emancipatory
Social Science and Genealogy: Habermas on Nietzsche.
Lee Kerckhove
Abstract:
I argue that Habermas' critique of Nietzsche overlooks the similarities
between his conception of an emancipatory social science and Nietzsche's
conception of genealogy. I conclude that it is necessary to disagree
with Habermas' contention that with Nietzsche the critique of modernity
abandons its emancipatory content.
No
Goddess Was Your Mother: Western Philosophy's Abandonment of Its
Multicultural Matrix.
Steven Schroeder
Abstract:
This paper begins with three observations: 1) At what is generally
believed to be its origin in ancient Greece, "Western" philosophy
is not sharply distinguished from poetry, science, or theology;
2) At what is generally believed to be its origin, "Western" philosophy
is not Western; it is born in a multicultural matrix consisting
of African, Asian, Middle Eastern, and Southern European influences;
3) As philosophy comes to think of itself as "Western," it separates
itself from poetry, science, and the rest of the world--particularly
from its roots in Northern Africa.
In the first three sections,
I examine each observation in turn. In the fourth section, I take
up the implications of "Western" philosophy's alienation from its
roots for the contemporary controversy surrounding multiculturalism.
If the roots of "Western" philosophy are multicultural, I propose
a "radical" philosophy that reclaims them in our own multicultural
context. More specifically, I propose to ask a question posed here
in its most brutal (but also most honest) form: does "Western" philosophy
depend on the abandonment of its friends and the murder of the indigenous
peoples it encounters? If yes, then it is necessary to ask whether
(in Virgil's terms) "piety" demands that the West march on in any
case. Colonialism and neo-colonialism join Aeneas in answering both
questions affirmatively. If no, then it is possible to proceed with
the kind of radical reclamation suggested above.
Volume
2, Number 2, Summer 1995
Thoreauvian
Patriotism as an Environmental Virtue
Philip Cafaro
Abstract:
In Walden Henry David Thoreau argues for and against patriotism.
This paper argues that thoughtful environmentalists should do likewise.
It explicates Thoreau's accounts of "settling" and farming as efforts
to rethink and deepen his connections to the land. These efforts
define a patriotism that is local, thoughtful and moral. Thoreau's
economic philosophy can be seen as applied patriotism. Like other
virtues such as courage or prudence, patriotism is liable to a skewed
development and various kinds of misuse. Yet properly developed
it is a part of a good human life. Thoreauvian patriotism provides
a strong base from which to oppose militarism and xenophobia, which
many intellectuals mistakenly equate with patriotism.
Ted
Schoen on "The Methodological Isolation of Religious Belief."
Frederick Ferre
Abstract:
In this brief comment on Ted Schoen's paper, I tend to agree more
than I disagree. Methodological isolation has been widely and uncritically
accepted by thinkers about religion and science, and Schoen's dissipation
of the isolationist discourse deserves positive notice. For too
long, science has been the bully of the epistemic neighborhood,
and religious thinkers have taken refuge in methodological isolation.
As Schoen argues, neither religion nor science is isolated; rather,
both are interacting in the same comprehensive and value-laden domain,
which also includes art, poetry, ethics and metaphysics.
A
Big Bang Cosmological Argument?
Dennis Temple
Abstract:
William Lane Craig has defended a modern First Cause argument
based on 1) a principle of universal causality and 2) the claim
that the universe must have had a beginning. But 1) is susceptible
to counter examples from quantum theory. Moreover, Craig's defense
of 2) is open to serious question. He claims that an actual infinity
(of time) is impossible; he also claims that 2) is in fact supported
by big bang theory. I argue that both of these claims are mistaken,
and that in consequence we have no particular reason to suppose
that 2) is true. I conclude that the First Cause argument fails,
but I suggest that a weaker inductive argument might be worth a
try.
Kant
and the Land Ethic
Jennifer Welchman
Abstract:
Does Leopold's land ethic principle represent a break with traditional
Western moral philosophies as some have argued? Or is it instead
an extension of traditional Western moral ideas as Leopold believed?
I argue that Leopold's principle is compatible with an ecologically-informed
Kantianism.
Philosophical
Counselling: Bridging the Narrative Rift
K. A. Zoe
Abstract:
Self-understanding is to a great extent defined by narrative: who
we are as human beings is determined by the stories we, and others,
tell about ourselves. Yet many are unable to compose coherent personal
narratives, as their experiences do not fall within the scope of
an accepted conceptual framework. Survivors of trauma are particularly
apt to fall into this "narrative rift, " where there can be no words
to describe, and hence can be no assimilation of, their experiences.
Using the example of child sexual abuse, and drawing on the work
of Bass, Spence, Schafer, and Guignon, I propose an examination
of the nature of narrative fragmentation itself. Philosophical counselling
may succeed where psychoanalysis might not: for where the latter
has theoretical commitments to specific narratives, the former,
through its reluctance to force epistemological or metaphysical
assumptions on the narrator, may well facilitate a more comprehensive
self-understanding.
Volume
2, Number 3, Fall 1995
Human-Centered
or Ecocentric Environmental Ethics?
John Howie
Abstract:
Are ethical principles that guide human behavior suitable for the
array of complex new environmental problems? Justice, nonmaleficence,
noninterference, and fidelity seem by extension to apply. Conflicts
between the principles of humanistic ethics and environmental ethics
may perhaps be resolved, as Paul W. Taylor indicates, through the
application of such "priority principles" as "self-defense," "proportionality,"
"minimum wrong," and "restitutive justice." Taylor suggests that
these principles would forbid moral agents from perpetrating harm
through direct killing, habitat destruction, environmental contamination,
and pollution.
On
The Alleged Uniqueness And Incomprehensibility Of The Holocaust.
B. William Owen
Abstract:
A number of philosophers have argued that the Holocaust is incapable
of philosophical analysis and explanation. There are two arguments
for this view: (1) that it is unique, and thus resists such analysis;
and (2) that it is incomprehensible, and thus incapable of being
understood. In this article, several versions of both of these arguments
are considered and shown not to support the conclusion that the
Holocaust resists philosophical explanation. An alternative route
to philosophical explanation is then suggested.
The
Kevorkian Challenge
Anthony Picchioni, Mary Ann Barnhart,
& Joe Barnhart
Abstract:
The problem of self-determination in the dying process confronts
a dilemma regarding clients' desire to know and not to know. Ambivalence
and guilt make "free choice" problematic in choosing the way to
die. Telling dying clients the "whole truth" about their condition
is an art or skill. The question of a meaningful death raises questions
that philosophical analysis can help clarify.
Galileo
and the Church: An Untidy Affair
Edward L. Schoen
Abstract:
In his recent review of the Galileo affair, Pope John Paul II confidently
proclaimed the intellectual autonomy of religion, comfortably affirming
that the methods and ideas of religion are cleanly separable from
those of the sciences. Unfortunately, a close review of the actual
details of the Galilean controversy reveals that the lesson to be
learned from that famous case is not one of sanitary intellectual
compartmentalization, but one of entangling interdependencies among
scientific, religious, and philosophical thought.
Volume
2, Number 4, Winter 1995
Between
Anthropocentrism and Ecocentrism
Noel E. Boulting
Abstract:
Three ways of relating the structures of human existence to the
world are offered by ecological holism, moral extensionism, and
biotic communitarianism. Leopold's attempt to reconcile these three
is examined in the light of Peirce's categories, in order to ascertain
how far Leopold's final position is anthropocentric, ecocentric,
neither, or both.
Earthday
25: A Retrospective of Reform Environmental Movements.
Bill Devall
Abstract:
Industrial growth and environmental protection have been in perpetual
conflict. Reform environmental movements have attempted to address
some of the worst abuses of nature by demanding government intervention
to restrain pollution. Also, these reform movements have cooperated
with corporate elites to obtain some controls on pollution. The
104th Congress attempted to destroy even weak pollution controls.
New efforts to mobilize resistance are occurring. The deep, long-range
ecology movement inspires resistance by affirming the joy of human
participation in nature.
The
Self Well Lost: Psychotherapeutic Interpretation and Nelson Goodman's
Irrealism.
Peter J. Mehl
Abstract:
In this paper, I consider Goodman's philosophy in relation to psychotherapeutic
interpretation. Goodman argues that we should understand our knowledge
as a creative symbolic construction, and not as a set of ideas that
match reality. The notion of "the world" does no epistemological
work. Using an example of psychotherapeutic interpretation found
in Erick Erickson's writings, I argue that while Erikson suggests
that he discovers in the patient's showings and tellings the patient's
message and its meaning, I argue (with Goodman) that Erikson creates
a narrative identity for his patient. The self is not found but
fashioned, and it is deemed the true self because it coheres with
Erikson's general theoretic standpoint and is found to be cognitively
and practically helpful for the patient. The conclusion is that
selves, like worlds, are largely creative constructs.
Volume
3, Number 1, Spring 1996
A
Feminist Interpretation of Vulnerability
Nancy J. Annaromao
Abstract:
Under patriarchy, the rationally autonomous agent engages in contractual
relations in a marketplace society. The contractual model reinforces
a negative conception of the vulnerable as weak and as susceptible
to injury and exploitation. Recent feminist writing has a positive
notion of vulnerability that is in conflict with contractualism.
Positive notions of vulnerability, the paper argues, are found in
Virginia Held's conception of mothering, Nel Noddings' analysis
of teaching, and Annette Baier's development of trust as essential
for social relationships.
The
Teaching of Ethics
Mark J. Doorley
Abstract:
The most important philosophy course that contemporary undergraduates
may take is ethics. Concerned with how to live a human life, ethics
becomes ever more urgent as life unfolds. As the teacher, a philosopher
likely wonders about the interaction in the classroom. This paper
explores that interaction. Taking a cue from Aristotle, it is argued
that the teaching of ethics is an invitation to self-reflection
and self-responsibility, more so than a passing on of a set of ethical
principles or laws.
Epistemology
of Technology Assessment: Collingridge, Forecasting Methodologies,
and Technological Control.
Cassandra L. Pinnick
Abstract:
This paper criticizes Collingridge's arguments against an epistemology
of technological control. Collingridge claims that because prediction
mechanisms are inadequate, his "dilemma of control" demonstrates
that the sociopolitical impact of new technologies cannot be forecasted,
and that, consequently, policy makers must concentrate their control
measures on minimizing the costs required to alter entrenched technologies.
I argue that Collingridge does not show on either horn that forecasting
is impossible, and that his criticisms of forecasting methods are
self-defeating for they undercut his positive case for the control
of entrenched technologies. Finally, I indicate an empirical base
for forecasting risk that may define epistemic principles of technology
assessment.
Sexual
Activity, Consent, Mistaken Belief, and Mens Rea.
Peg Tittle
Abstract:
The gendered subcultures of our society may have different value
systems. Consequently, sexual activity that involves members of
these subcultures may be problematic, especially concerning the
encoding and decoding of consent. This has serious consequences
for labelling the activity as sex or sexual assault. Conceiving
consent not as a mental act but as a behavioural act (that is, using
a performative standard) would eliminate these problems. However,
if we remove the mental element from one aspect, then to be consistent
we must remove it from all; and, as a result, the "mistaken belief"
defense would be eliminated and mens rea would become insignificant
(in other words, if what the woman means is irrelevant, then
what the man believes or intends should also be irrelevant).
This consequence suggests major changes to our current conceptions
of legal justice, which changes, if undesirable, prompt reconsideration
of the initial proposal to use a performative standard for consent.
Volume
3, Number 2, Summer 1996
Is
Naturalized Epistemology Experientially Vacuous?
Michael G. Barnhart
Abstract:
By naturalized epistemology, I mean those views expressed by
Nozick and Margolis among others who favor an evolutionary account
of human rationality as an adaptive mechanism which is unlikely
to provide the means of its own legitimization and therefore unlikely
to produce a single set of rules or norms which are certifiably
rational. Analyzing the likely relativism that stems from such a
view, namely that there could be divergent standards of rationality
under different historical or environmental conditions, I conclude
that evolutionary epistemologies are unable to account for rationality
as an experienced capacity on the part of human beings. After giving
a few examples of what seem to me to be cases where we do experience
a form of reason that appears antinomian, I challenge a naturalized
view of mind to embrace and provide some sort of explanatory account
of this kind of mental elasticity that it both seems to make room
for and is certainly not unfamiliar to other philosophical perspectives
such as that of Zen Buddhism.
Rethinking
Wilderness: The Need for a New Idea of Wilderness.
Michael P. Nelson
Abstract:
The "received" concept of wilderness as a place apart from and
untouched by humans is five-times flawed: it is not universalizable,
it is ethnocentric, it is ecologically naive, it separates humans
from nature, and its referent is nonexistent. The received view
of wilderness leads to dilemmas and unpalatable consequences, including
the loss of designated wilderness areas by political and legislative
authorities. What is needed is a more flexible notion of wilderness.
Suggestions are made for a revised concept of wilderness.
Toward
a Feminist Revision of Research Protocols on the Etiology of Homosexuality.
Stephanie S. Turner
Abstract:
Examining the language and paradigms of science as rhetorical, that
is, arising from the sociocultural forces that shape ideology, reveals
androcentric assumptions that tend to thwart democratic public policy
as well as effective methodology. This paper applies some recent
feminist critiques of the biological sciences to the current research
on the possible hormonal and genetic factors contributing to homosexuality,
clarifying how this research perpetuates hierarchical binaries and
suggesting ways to reconceptualize human sexuality through revised
research protocols.
Incommensurable
Differences: Cultural Relativism and Anti-rationalism Concerning
Self and Other.
Joseph Wagner
Abstract:
This paper is a defense of rationalism and a critique of what
I call anti-rationalist themes in postmodernist, feminist and multiculturalist
thought. I use the term rationalism in its broad sense to identify
an extensive set of philosophic assumptions rooted in the Enlightenment.
Rationalism in this sense encompasses the empiricist, materialist
and Kantian positions out of which modern analytic philosophy develops.
In particular, this paper focuses on criticisms that treat rationality
and attendant presumptions of objectivity as a Eurocentric form
of ethnocentrism. These anti-rationalist concerns are often expressed
in prescriptions for multiculturalism and complaints about Western
logocentrism and insensitivity to the importance of difference,
diversity, attunement, and other. The paper identifies
central themes that reflect this anti-modern and anti-rationalist
temper and argues that each embodies a deep irresolvable philosophic
confusion. In developing this critique, I try to show that the Enlightenment
project, properly understood, provides the best and most comprehensive
groundings for declaiming and remedying the faults of ethnocentrism
and prejudice.
Volume
3, Number 3, Fall 1996
Born
to Affirm the Eternal Recurrence: Nietzsche, Buber, and Springsteen.
Jonathan R. Cohen
Abstract:
I argue that the Bruce Springsteen song "Born to Run" needs
to be interpreted in light of--and thus gives evidence of a connection
between--the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Buber.
Along the way I give an in-depth reading of the Nietzschean doctrines
of Eternal Recurrence and Overman as they emerge from Also Sprach
Zarathustra, as well as a brief overview of Buber's I
and Thou.
Ethics
and MIS Education
Matthew K. McGowan & Richard J. McGowan
Abstract:
In this paper, we document the need for an education in ethics in
management information systems (MIS) curricula, identify the gap
in current curricula materials for MIS, and propose material and
an organization of material to include in MIS curricula. The paper
contributes to the development of material on ethics for MIS curricula,
and also advances the discussion between people educated in MIS
and people educated in ethics.
Fragmented
Selves and Loss of Community
Erin McKenna & J. Craig Hanks
Abstract:
In this paper we try to provide the beginning of an analysis of
some of the crises of our time. We do so by arguing that a certain
account of the individual blocks our ability to think about solutions
at the individual and the social levels. As an example we take the
industrialization of housework in the United States and its effects
on women's identity and on notions of "home." We suggest that the
rise of liberal individualism, the industrialization of public and
private life, and the predomination of capitalism are central to
the disintegration of the individual/self, and that they limit the
possibilities of some to determine the content and direction of
self change. We argue that a notion of self as integrated and in
process is needed in order to address our rapidly changing world.
The
Theory of Meaning: An Impasse
Abdur Razzaque
Abstract:
This paper endeavors to delineate the salient features of the
theory of meaning and to show how meaning converges with metaphysics.
For the British classical linguistic philosophers, meaning concerns
only autonomous propositions, which allegedly in isolation clarify
thought and facilitate understanding of language. But for the American
philosophers W. V. O. Quine and Donald Davidson, meaning is inextricably
related to human life and its problems. According to them, our experiences
are interrelated and cannot be separated from one another. A statement
cannot be meaningful in isolation; that is to say, it cannot have
meaning without holistic connections and metaphysical presumptions.
Volume
3, Number 4, Winter 1996
The
Supreme God in African (Igbo) Religious Thought.
Egbeke Aja
Abstract:
From African ontology, religious experiences, myths of creation,
and language, I argue that even though Africans (Igbo) conceive
of supreme deities, none of the adjudged supreme deities is identifiable
with the Supreme God propagated by Christian missionaries and theologians.
To translate, therefore, the names of African deities, such as Chukwu
or Chineke, to mean the God preached by Christians is to
yoke to the Igbo religious thought the concept "creation out of
nothing," which is alien to traditional African cosmology. Such
a translation will not only distort the architecture of traditional
African religion, it will impose on the Igbo the recognition of
a deity that would be beyond the reach of their standard reciprocity
arrangements with their Gods. Moreover, throughout Igboland, no
shrines are dedicated to the worship of an unknown God identifiable
with that propagated by Christians.
I
Married an Empiricist: A Phenomenologist Examines Philosophical
Personae.
Laura Duhan Kaplan
Abstract:
I suggest that philosophical writers should connect epistemological
theorizing with life experience in order to explore the complex
relationship between the two. The relationship of theory to experience
does not fit the neat hierarchical model of a small number of general
organizing principles giving form to or receiving form from a large
mass of facts. Instead, as the narrative of my honeymoon and my
life following it suggests, philosophical theories are one of the
many genres of stories philosophers tell themselves in the process
of creating and recreating personal identities and personae.
Liberalism
and Consumerism
Roger Paden
Abstract:
Communitarians have argued that liberalism somehow causes or leads
to a consumer society. Moreover, they have argued that consumer
society is somehow morally suspect. Given the connection between
liberalism and consumerism, they have argued that the moral problems
they have found in consumer society give reason to oppose liberalism.
In this paper, after defining "consumerism" and "liberalism," I
examine the various communitarian arguments against consumerism,
and the various arguments that seek to connect liberalism to consumerism.
I argue that only one of these arguments has any hope of establishing
this connection.
Re-claiming
Hestia: Goddess of Everyday Life.
Patricia J. Thompson
Abstract:
The concepts of "hearth and home" and "keeping the home fire
burning" can be traced back to ancient Greece and are associated
with the oikos. Such metaphors remain pervasive (if often
disregarded) expressions in contemporary life. The goddess Hestia,
identified as the "goddess of the hearth," has been maligned in
the patriarchal literature and ignored in feminist writing. This
paper argues for re-visiting and re-claiming Hestia as a unifying
principle in meeting the quotidian demands of everyday life. It
suggests a new perspective for further philosophical exploration
of the "private sphere" with special relevance for practical reasoning
in the ethics and aesthetics involved in contemporary life.
Volume
4, Numbers 1 & 2, Spring & Summer 1997
An
Incrementalist View of Proposed Uses of Information Technology in
Higher Education.
Marvin J. Croy
Abstract:
A number of national educational organizations and individual authors
have called for the use of information technology to radically reform
higher education. Several projections of how this reformation will
unfold are presented here. Three different approaches to critically
assessing these projections are considered in this article, two
briefly and one in more detail. Brief consideration is given to
an approach based on educational values and to an approach based
on cost/benefit analysis. After some discussion of the strengths
and weaknesses of these approaches, a third approach deriving from
a theory of technology control (incrementalism) is elaborated in
more detail and is found to offer helpful criticisms of the called
for revolution in higher education. Some recommendations for how
these new technologies can be developed in responsible ways are
also offered.
Authority,
Autonomy, Authenticity: An Etiological Understanding.
Charles W. Harvey
Abstract:
This essay attempts to understand the search for authenticity
in terms of the breakdown of authority in the modern world. The
sense of autonomy, I argue, emerges from the need to choose the
authorities one will accept. The ever-increasing difficulty of choosing
from among authorities is internalized and is experienced as a difficulty
of choosing, or "finding," oneself. The shattered authorities on
the outside become a fragmented self on the inside. The search for
the authentic self, then, is the search for an authority on the
inside that has been broken and lost on the outside. The prospects
for achieving such selfhood are critically evaluated.
On
Cyberspace and Being: Identity, Self, and Hyperreality.
Lucas D. Introna
Abstract:
Does it make sense to talk about cyberspace as an alternative social
reality? Is cyberspace the new frontier for the realization of the
postmodern self? For philosophers Taylor and Saarinen, and the psychologist
Turkle, cyberspace is the practical manifestation of a postmodern
reality, or rather hyperreality (Baudrillard). In hyperreal cyberspace,
they argue, identity becomes plastic, "I can change my self as easily
as I change my clothes." I will argue using Martin Heidegger that
our being is being-in-the-world. To be-in-the-world means to be
involved in the world; to have an involvement whole that is the
always already present significance of what I do. Furthermore, that
the making or choosing of self is only existentially meaningful
in a horizon of significance, and involvement whole. I will argue
that identity is tied to community, and community involves accepting
some level of already there thrownness. Every cyber-traveler will
eventually have to deal with the fact of being, always already,
in-the-world.
Matters
of Meaning: Authenticity, Autonomy, and Authority in Kierkegaard.
Peter J. Mehl
Abstract:
I argue that at least some of Kierkegaard's authorship is designed
to make a rational case for a religious and specifically Christian
existence; he is not a total fideist. He argues that anything short
of the existential stance of the "strong spiritual/moral evaluator"
is despair. To overcome this we are compelled to reach for religious
or transcendent sources of meaning; the authentic life is the life
of constant ethical and spiritual evaluation grounded in the authority
of God. But I ask how does Kierkegaard justify the stance of the
strong evaluator in the first place? I argue that he crafts an existential
and pragmatic case for it, but that this approach does not have
the strength he suggests. Indeed, I argue that because this defense
reflects his own Protestant Christian context, his case for Christian
existence (as an existence of strong spiritual/moral evaluation)
is seriously weakened.
Consumerism,
the Procedural Republic, and the Unencumbered Self.
Roger Paden
Abstract:
Communitarians have offered a number of arguments against liberalism
that connect liberalism to consumerism. In this paper, I examine
an argument to this effect developed by Michael Sandel. I argue
that Sandel's argument fails to undermine liberalism, but that it
does demonstrate that many contemporary liberals have placed too
great an emphasis on the principle of political neutrality. I argue
that liberalism, properly understood, requires both limited
neutrality and an emphasis on democratic deliberation. If this is
the case, than Sandel's argument misses its target. However, it
does point out how contemporary liberalism needs to be reformed.
By emphasizing more local democratic control over the economy, liberalism
would not only become more theoretically consistent, but it would
distance itself from consumerism.
One
Oppression Or Many?
Lani Roberts
Abstract:
Enquiry into the relationship between kinds of oppression raises
several possibilities. Perhaps there are multiple yet distinct oppressions.
If this is so, are there philosophical relationships among them?
What are the theoretical distinctions between racism and sexism,
for example. The question raised here has to do with the philosophical
structure of social dominance, rather than the discrete manifestations
usually based on distinct target groups. Although the characteristics
of peoples who are targets of each of the individual kinds of oppression
are different, and even though many people are multiply oppressed,
there is good reason to question the underlying assumption that
each form of oppression is fundamentally separate and distinct from
the others. There are many deep correspondences shared by specifically
focused theories of oppression. It is plausible to suggest there
is a single phenomenon called oppression. Perhaps there is only
one monster with several heads, rather than many monsters hiding
in our communal closet.
Language,
Meaning, and Ethics: A Phenomenological Correlation of Morality
and Self-Conscious Signification.
James B. Sauer
Abstract:
This paper takes up an underdeveloped argument of Charles Taylor
that linguisticality is constitutive of moral agency. Taylor's position
is part of a set of contemporary arguments that language, especially
as dialogue or discourse, is the normative framework which grounds
or validates fundamental norms or values. Taylor's contribution
to this "dialogical turn" is substantial and innovative, but it
is not without weakness. Rather than deal with all the issues involved
in this dialogical turn, I argue just that language does ground
morality as a distinctively human way of creating meaning, that
is, as Taylor argues, constitutive of the self and self-understanding.
Self-understanding, or the appropriation of moral self-consciousness,
is what is meant by the authenticity and autonomy which constitute
moral authority. I argue in essence that language provides a necessary
and constitutive link between private and public spheres of meaning
in a way that renders moral discourse meaningful and constitutively
human.
Against
Cartmill on Hunting: Kinship with Animals and the Midcentric Fallacy.
Forrest Wood, Jr.
Abstract:
Three recent books offer alternative views of hunting: Matt Cartmill's
A View to A Death in the Morning (Cartmill, 1993),
James Swan's In Defense of Hunting (Swan 1995), and Forrest
Wood's The Delights and Dilemmas of Hunting (Wood,1997).
First, I argue that Cartmill's claim of continuity of kind between
animals and persons is both overstated and logically disconnected
from the hunting/anti-hunting debate. Second, I argue that Cartmill's
claim that the suffering of sentient animals is somehow intrinsically
undesirable exhibits an unjustified prejudice toward middle-sized
organisms.
Volume
4, Number 3, Fall 1997
Wallace
Stevens: A Portrait of the Artist as a Phenomenologist.
James A. Clark
Abstract:
Confusing modern poetry with philosophy is a common fault of literary
criticism. Yet, the work of some poets can benefit critically from
philosophical interpretations. Wallace Stevens is a poet who manifested
an abiding interest in philosophy. His poems consistently display,
in both their syntax and modulation of thought, philosophical parallels.
Stevens' dominant mode of thought is phenomenological. This can
be shown by analyzing parallels between phenomenological methodology
and Stevens' poetry. Particularly three poems--"Thirteen Ways of
Looking at a Blackbird" (1917), "The Snow Man" (1921), and "The
Latest Freed Man" (1938)--embody, respectively, the poem as doing
phenomenology, the poem as a description of the phenomenological
mind, and the poem as a portrait of the phenomenologist.
Impartialism,
Care, and the Self.
M. Carmela Epright
Abstract:
In this paper, I discuss the ethics of care as a response to
impartialist ethical theories. In section 1, I contrast Gilligan's
critique of impartial ethical theories with other objections to
impartialism. In section 2, I analyze some of the ways in which
impartialists have attempted to understand the ethics of care since
the publication of Gilligan's text. In section 3, I argue against
proponents of impartialism and show that care constitutes an ethical
theory in its own right, not one which is dependent or parasitic
upon impartialism. In section 4, I contrast care ethic's conception
of the self with that offered by traditional ethical theories, and
argue that the most important distinction between the care and impartialist
accounts of morality lies in the conception of the moral self which
informs each of these approaches.
Ontological
Assumptions: Descartes, Searle, and Edelman.
Gregg E. Franzwa
Abstract:
The proposition that there is a purely causal explanation of subjective
states of human consciousness is a philosophical one. The affirmation
of such a proposition must be a premise to research. And the justification
for such a premise will be found in part in the fundamental ontological
assumptions of the researcher. By examining the assumptions of Rene
Descartes, at the beginning of the scientific age, I hope to show
a similar set of assumptions behind the thought of two recent contributors
to the debate, John Searle and Gerald Edelman. I will conclude that
a crucial question begged by all three.
The
View From Nowhere and the Meaning of Life in Thomas Nagel.
Larry D. Harwood
Abstract:
Thomas Nagel contends that the actual philosophical problem
in the meaning of life is the independent world we live in, and
only requires a self-transcendent being who glimpses and independent
world. I argue that Nagel is mistaken to think that self-transcendence
evokes the same anxiety for humans living in the world of Dante
as Darwin. Nagel's view from nowhere is rather a modern version
of the world. Secondly, while I concede that there is a common anxiety
felt by self-transcendence in glimpsing an independent objective
world, we also view that world through a set of beliefs that conditions
how we see that world.
The
Duty of Solidarity: Feminism and Catholic Social Teaching.
Sally J. Scholz
Abstract:
Catholic Social Teaching of late has a lot more in common with feminist
moral theory than might be evident at first glance, After a brief
explanation of Catholic Social Teaching's duty of solidarity, and
a look at some of the feminist critiques of this solidarity, I point
out some of the significant similarities between feminist ethics
and the duty of solidarity. The last section focuses on community
and care, the epistemological role of experience and the world view
of the other, the centrality of self-determination, and the final
goal of both the duty of solidarity and feminist ethics: liberation
from oppression.
Community
of Choice and Community of Origin: Insights into Dewey's Theory
of Communication.
Roger Ward
Abstract:
This essay unearths the meaning of community in John Dewey's
Experience andNature, using Marilyn Friedman's terms "community
of choice" and "community of origin." The authority of communication
as determinative of Dewey's community comes out. In fact, communication
seems to be the philosophical point of Dewey's descriptions in that
book, which reveals his anticipation of a community wherever communication
obtains. Dewey is shown, in conclusion. to call us beyond communities
of choice or origin to a community of authority which holds both
peculiar promise for, and demands of, individuals.
Volume
4, Number 4, Winter 1998
APA
Central Division Group Session G1-3, May 7, 1998, Chicago, Illinois:
Richard Cohen on Levinas and Rosenzweig.
Engaging
Transcendence: Can We Think G-d and Philosophy Together?
James B. Sauer
No
Abstract
It's
(Almost) All Greek To Me: Levinas's "Ethics As First Philosophy"
and Analytic Philosophy.
Stiv Fleishman
No
Abstract
Responses
to Sauer and Fleishman
Richard A. Cohen
No
Abstract
Community
and Alterity: A Gadamerian Approach.
Donald M. Maier
Abstract:
In this paper, I ask how we, as linguistically constituted subjects,
form communities that respect difference. Whatever "commonality"
we find in our multicultural society cannot be grounded in a narrow
concept of reason, a singular method of inquiry, or an a priori
logic, but in language. By examining Hans-Georg Gadamer's concept
of linguisticality, we see that there can be a universal ground
of meaning that will foster the formation of communities without
recourse to the traditional foundations of thinking. Gadamer contends
that language presents philosophy an infinite task that urges us
to consider our fundamental linguisticality, the linguistic experience
from which languages develop. By examining Augustine's notion of
the "innerword", Gadamer explains our capacity to understand others,
even when understanding seems least likely. Gadamer's hermeneutics
encourages us to understand the Other's language. I conclude that
a Gadamerian community allows us to understand each other without
requiring that the Other become like us.
Multinational
Ethics At Work in Nigeria
Eddy Souffrant
Abstract:
Cases of intervention in international affairs are often thought
justifiable if the intervention is exercised against rogue political
leaders and delinquent nation-states. The author offers an argument
for the inclusion of an increasingly ubiquitous international agent,
the profit generating corporation. This done, the paper argues that
a cosmopolitan ethics of responsibility is an attractive mode of
evaluation that renders corporations accountable in the international
environment. This ethics of responsibility is applied to the particular
case of British/Dutch Shell, Inc., in Nigeria to argue the merits
of international intervention.
Reclaiming
Hermes: Guardian of the Public Sphere.
Patricia J. Thompson
Abstract:
In an earlier paper, Hestia (R. Vesta)--guardian of the family hearthfire
and center of household/family ritual activities in the ancient
Greek oikos--was re-claimed as a metaphor for philosophical
analysis of the private sphere in everyday life (SPCW, 1996). This
paper undertakes a comparable project of reclamation for Hermes
(R. Mercury), guardian of the public sphere of the ancient Greek
polis and its later manifestations. The goal of this project
of reclamation is not to introduce unnecessary neologisms or to
support "New Age" spirituality. It is, rather, to help philosophers
and social theorist to hold in mind two distinctive systems of human
action within a single explanatory paradigm. Doing so allows us
to compare and contrast in a consistent and coherent manner events,
institutions, and actions in each of two systems operating in everyday
life without privileging one (usually the polis and the political
) over the other (the oikos and the familial). It is hoped
that doing so may promote a dual standpoint theory that can take
contemporary feminist theory (which seems to have painted itself
into a corner) beyond gender.
Volume
5, Number 1, Spring 1998
Hegel's
Impact on Russian Constitutional Development
Alexander S. Fesenko
Abstract:
This essay argues that the thinker whose teaching played a key role
in the formation of the Rusian political and legal paradigm was
no Marx but Hegel. It analyzes the impact of the Hegelian philosophy
on the development of the Russian constitutional tradition and examines
its political implications.
The
Irony of Political Philosophy
Andrew Fiala
Abstract:
Political philosophy is a paradoxical attempt to bring reason
to bear upon a subject matter that is irrational. This problem has
been side-stepped by many contemporary political thinkers. Political
theorists like Iris Young, Michael Sandel, Jean Elshtain, Robert
Bork, and Richard Peterson acknowledge that contemporary political
life, with its lack of democratic participation and its undemocratic
bureaucratic institutions and is undergoing a legitimization crisis.
This approach forgets, however, that there can be no rational resolutions
within the political realm. Political philosophy alone cannot resolve
the legitimization crisis. This is especially so because the contemporary
legitimization crisis arises, in part, from a lack of rationality
on the part of both agents and institutions. Yet, we cannot fully
give up on the enterprise of political philosophy. To do so would
be to acquiesce to irrationality and the lack of legitimization
found in contemporary political life. This paper argues that political
philosophers, ay their best, must adopt a deliberately ironic disposition;
while demanding rational analyses of political life, they must acknowledge
that rational analysis may itself be ineffectual in political life.
Encountering
the Face of God: A Levinasian Exploration of Theistic Existentialism
Laura Duhan Kaplan
Abstract:
This essay explores the intersection of the ideas of Emmanuel Levinas
and theistic existentialism by exploring the metaphor of being confronted
by the blank face of God in times of great stress. Levinas criticizes
the history of metaphysics for focusing exclusively on the analysis
of objects. He aims to redirect philosophy toward the study of relationships,
and focuses on the experience eof being confronted by another human
face. Jean-Paul Sartre's proof of the nonexistence of God illustrates
Levinas' critique. Sartre treats God as an object with determinate
properties, and concludes that all who believe in Gid are seeking
a false sense of security. Many theistic existentialist, however,
speak of God as a partner in relationship, rather than as a thing,
and do not expect to be freed from uncertainty or responsibility
through a relationship with God.
Philosophy
as Argument/Philosophy as Conversation
Edward G. Lawry
Abstract:
This paper criticizes the understanding of philosophy as entirely
made up of argument. It gives some characterization of argument
as a rhetorical form and conversation as a motivating attitude.
It explicates the understanding of this distinction in Book 1 of
Plato's Republic, and emphasizes the contemporary relevance
of the distinction by appeal to the work of Richard Rorty. While
respectful of Rorty's insights, it sides more with the Platonic
understanding of philosophical conversation, which does not abandon
the pursuit of truth.
Abortion,
Christianity, and Consistency
Richard Schoeing
Abstract:
I describe three major areas in which I argue that Christians'
belief that abortion is morally wrong is inconsistent with other
important abortion-related mainstream Christian beliefs or actions
based on those beliefs. The three areas are: (1) abortion and soul-saving;
(2) abortion prevention and violence; and (3) abortion and the fate
of frozen fertilized human eggs. I make no direct argument about
the moral status of abortion itself.
Between
Dogmatism and Relativism: André Comte-Sponville's Cynicism
Sébastien Charles
Abstract:
This essay introduces the work of André Comte-Sponville to
an English audience by explaining his ethical position. Comte-Sponville
calls this position "cynicism," and intends it as a corrective of
the excesses of both relativism and dogmatism. The distinction critical
for understanding cynicism is that between value and truth, which
are here used to explain all three: cynicism, dogmatism, and relativism.
Volume
5, Numbers 2-3, Summer-Fall 1998
That
is the Happiest Conversation...
James B. Sauer
No
Abstract
A
Modest Realism
Joe Frank Jones, III
Abstract:
This essay argues that essentialism and epistemological foundationalism
can be separated, and that a "humble" realism-foundationalism can
be described which explains common cultural practices like counseling.
A necessary constructionist component survives in this still legitimately
'realist' position, but it is shown not to lead to any crippling
skepticism or relativism, as does pure constructionism.
In
Support of a Modest Realism: Applications to Narratives of Self
and Philosophical Methodology.
Laura Duhan Kaplan
Abstract:
The "modest realism" described by Joe Frank Jones, III offers a
sound methodological model for developing both self-understanding
and philosophical theories. Claire Chafee's play Why We Have
a Body illustrates the pitfalls of living both a thoroughgoing
realism and a thoroughgoing idealism and argues for the conception
of a life story as a project in which discovery and invention play
side by side. Stanley Cavell argues that the shape of a philosophy
mirrors the shape of a philosopher's life. Thereby he suggests that
Ludwig Wittgenstein saw his own revolutionary philosophical work
as a species of modest realism, i.e., continuing to turn in fruitful
directions, rather than as a species of anti-idealism, i.e., rejecting
an entire tradition of philosophical theorizing.
A
Modest Constructionism: Response to Joe Frank Jones, III.
Charles W. Harvey
Abstract:
In this response I argue (a) that Jones' minimalist realism is,
also, a minimalist constructionism. And (b) that the silent sphere
of evidence that Jones' uses to ground his realism, may not be able
to supply even a minimalist, strictly negative ground for epistemic
endeavors.
Dissociation:
An Evolutionary Interpretation
Joe Barnhart, Ph.D.
Abstract:
My hypothesis is that human personhood has ancient biological
roots which make it possible for social reinforcers to contribute
to the gradual construction of real persons who are always deeper
than the stories about them. Multiple persons do sometimes emerge
from one human organism. Rather than try to prove they are real,
I explore the consequences of assuming them to be genuine emergents
that become social environment to one another. I suggest that the
multiple-persons phenomenon has profoundly influenced the development
of human ethics and the attainment of personhood through the pursuit
of ideals.
Toward
a Hermeneutics of Memory and Multiple Personality.
Randall R. Lyle
Abstract:
Barnhardt, in "Dissociation: An Evolutionary Interpretation,"
makes a case for understanding multiple personality as a "natural"
phenomenon resulting from human biological evolution. He also argues
that the reason that "multiple personalities" are not encountered
more frequently is a result of a social construction encouraging
"single" personalities. He concludes that it is from the interaction
between the two that ethics derive. In this response I offer an
alternative hermeneutic, using memory as the interpretive key, and
by introducing Ricoeur's work on narrative, highlight how Barnhardt's
argument limits us to a "scientific" understanding of Multiple Personality
and thus limits our ability to understand and enact a viable "ethic"
of care.
Insight,
Judgment, World: Rethinking the Ontology of Being and Time.
Jerome A. Miller
Abstract:
Revisiting Heidegger's interpretation of "world" in Being and
Time can help us come to grips with the conflict between the
naturalistic and hermeneutical points of view which post-modernism
has aggravated rather than resolved. After discussing Heidegger's
account of the "hermeneutical circle," and his rejection of the
correspondence theory of truth, I argue that , to "save" truth form
hermeneutical relativism, Heidegger smuggles naturalism inside the
hermeneutical circle. I suggest that, in order to abandon naturalism
without abandoning truth, it is necessary to radically rethink the
nature of judgment and recognize that it alone completes our ontological
access to the world.
Changing
the Metaphors of Foundation
Kenneth L. Buckman
Abstract:
The traditional philosophical metaphors of epistemology, which speak
of grounds or foundation, produce a conception of knowledge as fixed
and absolute. This paper is not an effort to revive |